Mariott Latest Company To "Lose" Consumer Data

Marriott’s time-share division admitted this week that it could not find personal consumer information, including Social Security Numbers, for more than 200,000 consumers. The company said in a statement that the records may simply be “lost”, but could not rule out theft.

We regret this situation has occurred and realize this may cause concern for our associates and customers,” said Stephen P. Weisz, MVCI president. “We have recently mailed notifications to associates, timeshare owners and timeshare customers and are available to answer any questions they may have.”

Consumer advocates, meanwhile, continue to express concern over the millions of cases of identity theft occcuring each year, many of which can be traced back to data breaches. “Organizations that handle sensitive consumer data must be held accountable for any use of that data,” said Consumer Help Web President Joan Bounacos. “We encourage Congress to enact severe penalties for organizations who breach consumer trust by losing personal data and endangering consumer credit and other records.”

Privacy expert Robert Douglas echoed Bounacos’ comments on his web site, PrivacyToday.com, reporting that he had told The Washington Post, “For the longest time, people have said it’s the consumers’ fault. They don’t shred their bank statements at home, or what have you. But since the California law was passed now we are learning how much of this information has been breached and is floating around out there.”

Marriott joins multiple corporations who have reported data breaches this year, including ChoicePoint and LexisNexis.

Posted under Privacy

This post was written by George Bounacos on December 30, 2005

Tags: , ,

Marriott, Alaska Air Lead 9 Travel Cos. In Above Average Ratings

The Customer Respect Group, an international research and consulting firm that focuses on how corporations treat their customers online, today released the results of its Third Quarter 2005 Online Customer Respect Study of the largest Airline and Travel firms.

The study is the only one to bring objective measure to the analysis of corporate performance from an online customer’s perspective. It assigns a Customer Respect Index (CRI(TM)) rating to each company. The Customer Respect Index is a qualitative and quantitative in-depth analysis and independent measure of a customer’s online experience when interacting with companies via the Internet. Scores of 8.0 and above are considered excellent and show an admirable level of Customer Respect. Scores 4.0 and below are considered poor and are badly lacking in Customer Respect.

By interviewing a representative sample of the adult Internet population, and by analyzing and categorizing more than 2000 corporate Web sites across a spectrum of industries in detail, The Customer Respect Group has determined the attributes that combine to create the entire online customer experience. These attributes have been grouped together and measured as indicators of Simplicity (ease of navigation), Responsiveness (quick and helpful responses to inquiries), Privacy (respect for the privacy of the customer), Attitude (customer-focus of site), Transparency (open and honest policies) and Principles (values and respects customer data). Combined they measure a company’s overall Customer Respect.

Summary Results/Comparisons

Although a direct comparison is difficult because of the inclusion of industry-specific questions, the average CRI based on 660 surveys of corporate Web sites in various industries throughout 2004 was 5.9. Meanwhile, travel firms in this study scored 7.2 (versus 6.8 in the Q1 2005 report). By segment, car rental companies on average scored highest at 7.6, Web-based resellers and passenger transportation firms scored 7.3, hotels rated 7.1, airlines came in at 7.0 and cruise lines scored 6.7.

Nine Travel related Web sites received “excellent” CRI scores (8.0 and above), including Marriott International, Alaska Air Group, Enterprise, InterContinental Hotels Group, Northwest Airlines, Travelocity, US Airways Group, Avis and Orbitz.

Looking at the sectors in more detail, car rental companies overall were very good at responding to online inquiries but most likely to share personal data. Web-based resellers and passenger transportation firms were generally the least likely to share data. Airlines and cruise line were generally poor at responding to online questions while hotels scored lowest in Principles.
In terms of the speed and quality of the email responses, the companies in this report also compare very favorably. Only nine percent of inquiries were not answered. In addition, 69 percent of replies arrived within a day and 68 percent were very helpful.

However, the industry needs to improve in some key areas. In particular, the area of data sharing needs to be addressed. More companies in this report share data with business partners and third parties than the global average. In fact, some 38 percent either share information with outside parties or are unclear about their policies. This percentage remains consistent with the Q1 2005 report.

“We see the improvement in the travel industry as a direct result of competition. Hotels, airline and car rental companies are working very hard to attract direct bookings and circumvent the Web-based resellers,” said Terry Golesworthy, president of The Customer Respect Group. “In order to compete, the standard for customer respect simply had to be raised to gain trust from customers that were being asked to supply substantial amounts of personal information. The impact of privacy concerns is now one of the hot buttons in the travel industry.”

“While there have been improvements in many areas, such as Transparency of policies, Responsiveness and even Attitude, there is still a major unseen factor which is troubling,” said Anthony Naylor, director of research for The Customer Respect Group. “The sharing of personal information outside the organization is still too big a temptation for many travel companies. There really is an impact for those companies that continue this practice.”

The report conveys in great detail improvement opportunities for each company.
Web Sites that achieved an “Excellent” Customer Respect rating include the following:

Marriott International 8.4
———————————————
Alaska Air Group, Inc. 8.3
———————————————
Enterprise Car Rental 8.2
———————————————
InterContinental Hotels Group 8.2
———————————————
Northwest Airlines Corporation 8.2
———————————————
Travelocity 8.1
———————————————
US Airways Group 8.1
———————————————
Avis 8.0
———————————————
Orbitz 8.0

A sample of other findings for all surveyed firms include the following:

  • Companies received the best average rating (8.0) for Transparency and Attitude and the worst (5.8) for Responsiveness.
  • Some 26 percent of firms did not respond consistently or did not respond at all to online inquiries resulting in nine percent of all online inquiries being ignored.
  • Looking at all inquiries made, including those ignored, 69 percent were answered within a day of being sent, considered to be the time limit that consumers will accept. Taken one level further and looking at the nature of the response, 39 percent were responded within the day and were considered helpful.
  • Some 38 percent of firms are either unclear or share data with outside third parties or business partners.
  • After personal data is collected, seven percent of sites provide no means to “opt out” of future marketing campaigns.
  • Only 37 percent of firms always use SSL or Https forms consistently to provide security when collecting personal data.
  • Only 20 percent of the firms provide an FAQ, site search and a site map to assist the customer self serve.

Posted under Customer Service

This post was written by George Bounacos on August 3, 2005

Tags: , , ,