One year after testing whole body imaging at New York’s Staten Island Ferry and weeks after a pilot program in the busy Phoenix airport, the US Transportation Security Administration is ready to start getting a closer look at consumers traveling.
For consumers who have been “patted down” or “frisked” while traveling, the new machine may seem like an alternative to an undignified position some travelers undergo because of their undergarments, medical devices or similarly benign issues. We wholeheartedly endorse national security and understand the need for stringent measures, but more than one consumer has shared with us that being frisked in the middle of a crowded public facility is unpleasant at best and often embarrassing.
Hand-held metal detectors are often used in such cases, but a nervous twitch can cause the machine to come in contact with a traveler’s ’s body. And while many consumers seem resigned to shuck off their shoes and travel through the airport in stockinged or (heaven help us) bare feet, removing jackets, belts and other clothing is often time-consuming at best.
“I like belts with big buckles,” one consumer recently told me. “I can’t wear them to the airport though because I have to take off my coat, my shoes, my belt and put my computer in a tray. I used to be able to just undo the buckle and show them the back, but now I have to take it off, and it’s not worth the hassle.”
Whole body imaging is supposed to replace the need for a pat-down although other measures will still be in force. Many travel and privacy advocates say a whole body image invades a consumer’s privacy, but federal officials counter with a statistic that 90% of travelers subjected to the process in Phoenix preferred it to a “pat down” or similar measures.
The TSA also says that they will not maintain or store records of any captured images, but that doesn’t address the point that the consumer is, well, exposed, for a time to strangers.
The image on the left is representative of what the TSA says its officers will see. With paperless bordering passes and other biometrics processes quickly being tested throughout the nation, we want to believe that this image isn’t stored, but we also wanted to believe that doctors wouldn’t read a celebrity’s medical file and IRS employees wouldn’t snoop through the taxes of the rich and famous.
Without more explanation of what safeguards are in place to protect a consumer’s privacy, whole body imaging is a promising idea we can’t yet support. Once we learn that images will never be associated with personally identifyig information and that no mechanism exists to save the image, we would be more willing to endorse and embrace this idea.
There clearly isn’t enough time for that public reassurance, however, because the government has announced that travelers moving through Los Angeles’ LAX or New York’s JFK airports will soon be subjected to whole body imaging or being frisked if they set off a detector.
Apparently willing to base taxpayer dollars and consumer acceptance on a limited one airport test, the TSA has also reportedly ordered 30 more machines for use in other airports this year.
Posted under Travel
This post was written by George Bounacos on April 16, 2008
